There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I seriously think they need to be addressed. They are: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in 2.1). They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's success. Q On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean GERONIMO-4625 > > > 2009/9/11 Ivan <[email protected]> >> >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2 >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801 >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted >> exception >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821 >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-( >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836 >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493 >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603 >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon >> >> Thanks ! >> >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <[email protected]> >>> >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our >>> snapshot dependencies. >>> >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on >>> and an estimate for completion. >>> >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2 >>> please reply and describe what you'd like. >>> >>> many thanks >>> david jencks >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ivan > > > > -- > Ivan > -- Quintin Beukes
