I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a JIRA...
-Jack On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes <quin...@skywalk.co.za>wrote: > There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I > seriously think they need to be addressed. They are: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861 > > The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in > 2.1). > > They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can > potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's > experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's > success. > > Q > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean > GERONIMO-4625 > > > > > > 2009/9/11 Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com> > >> > >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2 > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801 > >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted > >> exception > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821 > >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-( > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836 > >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, > >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493 > >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603 > >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon > >> > >> Thanks ! > >> > >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > >>> > >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we > >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting > very > >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our > >>> snapshot dependencies. > >>> > >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like > to > >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are > working on > >>> and an estimate for completion. > >>> > >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into > 2.2 > >>> please reply and describe what you'd like. > >>> > >>> many thanks > >>> david jencks > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Ivan > > > > > > > > -- > > Ivan > > > > > > -- > Quintin Beukes >
