On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
There were several files missing source license headers. I've fixed
in branches/2.1
2.1??
. They would both merit a -1 from me.
Where is the code in svn?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.2
Although I use the source archives to verify the release, I also
usually diff against the code in svn. Couldn't figure out how to do
that, here...
I haven't run a build, yet. But took a look through my typical
checks and didn't see any other problems...
thanks
david jencks
--kevan
On Nov 28, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2.2 release candidate built using
the maven-release-plugin.
See the jira issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
something plausible builds from them.
Since we're on a holiday weekend and we have to verify that the
binaries pass the tck the voting is likely to remain open for more
than the minimum 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Many thanks
david jencks
