I'll redo the release with the updated license headers and I expect
the warning fix.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote:
If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly
disagree. We have no reason I can see to avoid following maven
defaults here. With the exception of the main geronimo release,
previously done through an arcane and IMO incomprehensible process,
everything we've released in the last year or so has used the
release plugin default tag locations of <artifactid>-<version>.
I favor consistency with past releases. So, fall on the other side
of the fence. Following maven's default is simply following an
arbitrary decision that maven made. 'geronimo-2.2' seems to hold
little value to anyone... All that said, I'm not going to argue with
you.
Once the source problems (that I've fixed in branches/2.2) are
fixed, looks like I'll be +1. Until then, I'm -1.
I've also added a work-around to avoid the annoying WARN log
messages from DWR in branches/2.2. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885952&view=rev
Wouldn't mind seeing that picked up, but it's not necessary...
--kevan
