When I did the 2.1.5 release, David told me the same thing that need to fix. So I created the "all-subprojects" for that release. I recorded what I did in the section "Special changes for releasing the server 2.1.5" of this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-215-release-tips.html
HTH -Rex 2010/6/5 David Jencks <[email protected]> > > On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > > > I'm not sure how critical this is but there is a bunch of "server" > > modules that are not built by default (only with 'mini-servers' > > profile) that still use 3.0-M1-SNAPSHOT version in their poms. > > > > Similar thing with in testsuites but those modules will never be build > > since they are commented out in the poms. > > When I did 2.2 I tried to deal with this by including all these projects in > the "all-submodules" profile and configuring the deploy plugin with "skip" > so they would have their versions upgraded by the release plugin, and get > built, but not deployed. ( I built the release with > -Papache-release,all-submodules) > > I don't have an opinion yet on whether we should fix this for M1. If we > re-roll M1 for other reasons I would definitely want it fixed. > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > Jarek > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've managed to come up with a 3.0-M1 release candidate built using the > >> maven-release-plugin. > >> > >> See the jira issues here: > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 > >> > >> Staged to > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/ > >> > >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz > >> > >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something > >> plausible builds from them. > >> > >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door > >> [ ] 0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) > >> > >> Rick > >> > > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org
