These problems should be fixed now (and also added another all-subprojects profile to web-testsuite).
Jarek On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm trying to run testsuites on M1 and I have ran into 2 problems so > far. Trying to fix them now. > > Jarek > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: >> Canceling this due to the LICENSE and NOTICE file problems in the >> assemblies. These files were hiding in a corner of the svn tree where I >> didn't spot the additional copies so they never got updated. I'll also >> correct the problem with the mini-server version numbers at the same time. >> >> I'm going to need some help from others to correct any of the other issues, >> particularly the release notes. Those closest to the information need to be >> providing the information we need to include, particularly the information >> about the new commands. How long should I hold the release open waiting for >> these additional items? >> >> >> Rick >> >> On 6/5/2010 12:09 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>> Source, signatures, and build all look good to me. Spot checks of jar file >>> legal information looks good. Assemblies start. I didn't run any extensive >>> tests, but didn't see any functional problems. >>> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> license/notice files in assemblies are different than the source >>> license/notice files. "different" is ok. The binary notice file is using a >>> different format. I can live with that. However, it seems to be missing >>> content... I suspect that it's a NOTICE file that we used for a G 2.1.x >>> release... >>> >>> For this reason, I'm -1 for release. >>> >>> Minor issues, which, IMO, do not necessarily require fixing: >>> >>> Binary distributions do not include any documentation. They should include >>> release notes/readme, etc. Information on how to run geronimo. Looks like >>> the 2.2 releases didn't include this doc, either. We did in 2.1.x. Given new >>> commands, etc. Would be really good to have some documentation included in >>> the distribution... I could easily call this a major issue... >>> >>> I get the following WARNINGS during server startup: >>> WARN [aries] Managed persistence context support is no longer available >>> for use with the Aries Blueprint container >>> WARN [StringManager] Can't find resource >>> org.apache.pluto.driver.container.LocalStrings >>> sun.misc.launcher$appclassloa...@553f5d07 >>> WARN [SystemProperties] Existing Property=openejb.log.factory is already >>> set to Value=org.apache.openejb.util.PaxLogStreamFactory >>> WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load class: >>> org.apache.activemq.network.jms.JmsTopicConnector due to >>> org/springframework/jndi/JndiTemplate >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,239 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.spring.SpringSslContext due to >>> org/springframework/core/io/Resource >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,242 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerService due to >>> org/springframework/context/ApplicationContextAware >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,276 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.network.jms.JmsQueueConnector due to >>> org/springframework/jndi/JndiTemplate >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,320 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQXAConnectionFactory due to >>> org/springframework/beans/factory/BeanNameAware >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,452 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.store.PersistenceAdapterFactoryBean due to >>> org/springframework/beans/factory/FactoryBean >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:14,455 WARN [XBeanNamespaceHandler] Could not load >>> class: org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQConnectionFactory due to >>> org/springframework/beans/factory/BeanNameAware >>> >>> I get the following WARNING on server shutdown: >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:21,230 WARN [aries] Managed persistence context support >>> is no longer available for use with the Aries Blueprint container >>> 2010-06-05 11:31:21,263 WARN [context] The >>> TransactionSynchronizationRegistry used to manage persistence contexts is no >>> longer available. Managed persistence contexts will no longer be able to >>> integrate with JTA transactions, and will behave as if no there is no >>> transaction context at all times until a new >>> TransactionSynchronizationRegistry is available. Applications using managed >>> persistence contexts may not work correctly until a new JTA Transaction >>> services implementation is available. >>> >>> I get the following during shutdown of a jetty server: >>> >>> 2010-06-05 11:44:52,315 WARN [log] FAILED >>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.ser...@203feeda: >>> java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError >>> 2010-06-05 11:44:52,316 ERROR [GBeanInstance] Problem in doStop of >>> org.apache.geronimo.configs/jetty8/3.0-M1/car?ServiceModule=org.apache.geronimo.configs/jetty8/3.0-M1/car,j2eeType=GBean,name=JettyWebContainer >>> java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError >>> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStop(Server.java:316) >>> at >>> org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:80) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.jetty8.JettyContainerImpl.doStop(JettyContainerImpl.java:289) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.destroyInstance(GBeanInstance.java:1122) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStop(GBeanInstanceState.java:340) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:189) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:552) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:430) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:181) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:552) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:430) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:181) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:552) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:430) >>> at >>> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.osgi.ConfigurationActivator.stop(ConfigurationActivator.java:93) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.stopActivator(SecureAction.java:683) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.stopBundle(Felix.java:2128) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1152) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264) >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637) >>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Shutdown in progress >>> at >>> java.lang.ApplicationShutdownHooks.add(ApplicationShutdownHooks.java:39) >>> at java.lang.Runtime.addShutdownHook(Runtime.java:192) >>> at >>> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.ShutdownThread.<init>(ShutdownThread.java:48) >>> at >>> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.ShutdownThread.<clinit>(ShutdownThread.java:36) >>> ... 20 more >>> >>> I noticed that for minimal server (jetty), ServerHostname is 0.0.0.0. For >>> java ee server (tomcat) ServerHostname defaults to localhost. >>> >>> I'm tempted to start asking that releases be prepared on non-Windows >>> machines (or we should make some effort to keep Windows CR/LF line-endings >>> out of our files). There are a bunch of mixed-mode files in the binary >>> distribution. >>> >>> --kevan >>> >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I've managed to come up with a 3.0-M1 release candidate built using the >>>> maven-release-plugin. >>>> >>>> See the jira issues here: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 >>>> >>>> Staged to >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/ >>>> >>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives >>>> >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz >>>> >>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something >>>> plausible builds from them. >>>> >>>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door >>>> [ ] 0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) >>>> >>>> Rick >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
