I had the same question, tho I never asked it. I think the branches should be named 2.1 and 2.2 as well. As Kevan points out, this works for server. I think GEP should do it this way too.
Ted On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/ > > * .. > * 2.1.7/ > * 2.2.1/ > > Is there any special reasons that we have to use this kind of version way ? > > I think we should name them 2.1 and 2.2 instead of 2.1.7 and 2.2.1. > Upgrade the branch name for each release will lose the full svn > history view of a branch. > -- > Shawn >
