I don't know the reason either, seems it's a convention for GEP from version 1.2.1. You may make it the same as server, I think.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Ted Kirby <[email protected]> wrote: > I had the same question, tho I never asked it. I think the branches > should be named 2.1 and 2.2 as well. As Kevan points out, this works > for server. I think GEP should do it this way too. > > Ted > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/ > > > > * .. > > * 2.1.7/ > > * 2.2.1/ > > > > Is there any special reasons that we have to use this kind of version > way ? > > > > I think we should name them 2.1 and 2.2 instead of 2.1.7 and 2.2.1. > > Upgrade the branch name for each release will lose the full svn > > history view of a branch. > > -- > > Shawn > > > -- Best Regards, Delos
