I’ve monitored G for several years since my departure. For me, JEE is not my main area of focus and as such, I’ve invested little time in the project apart from reading the e-mail threads. This is a community decision and posting the discussion to dev@ is the right venue.
As an inactive member I don’t have a strong vote, but, my observation is that most of the community has moved on and there is little activity. If those that are still active want to keep going then God’s speed. Matt Hogstrom m...@hogstrom.org +1-919-656-0564 PGP Key: 0x90ECB270 Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/matt.hogstrom> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/mhogstrom> Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/hogstrom> "I’m smart enough to know how dumb I am." - Hogstrom > On Mar 9, 2017, at 08:47, Jason Dillon <jdil...@apache.org> wrote: > > On March 8, 2017 at 10:44:45 AM, Mark Struberg (strub...@yahoo.de > <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>) wrote: >> Alan, I understand that you don't want to put much more energy into this >> project. That is totally understandable and fine. >> But while you are PMC chair you still cannot declare that the project is >> dead as long as there are enough PMC members still active to keep the >> project going. > > Mark, I agree with Alan and Kevan, though put into my own words I think the > project and community is no longer viable (and has not been for a while). I > do believe there are still useful aspects to the project, but I don’t think > its enough to leave on its own. > > We can certainly wait for more PMC members to chime in if they are still > monitoring. As Jeff recommended I’m including the private@ list for PMC > folks that may not be paying as much attention to the dev@ list. > >> Before we dump the project I suggest we start with an analysis of where we >> are right now. >> >> What about starting look into >> .) Who is still active and willing to continue Geronimo as a ee-commons >> project? > > So far I’ve not really seen anyone over the past days of communication about > this. But we’ll see. > > —jason > > > >> .) Which project parts of the project are of some shared interest and might >> be good to get some maintenance love and some realistic chance that this is >> gonna happening? > > I can’t speak for the others, but I have zero interested in putting any love > in to any of what is presently here. > > I will defer to others to explain if they feel otherwise, though I do recall > some chatter on private@ but will probably need those folks to re-post to > dev@ to include that discussion. > > —jason >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
