> On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic.
> 
> My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o.
> 
> 
> [email protected] -> merge into [email protected] We only had 2 messages in the whole last 
> year!


I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists.  The dearth of emails is due to 
the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists.

> [email protected] -> move to [email protected]
> 
> [email protected] -> move to [email protected]
> 
> [email protected] -> move to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

There’s already a ticket to remove these.

> [email protected] -> Last mail on Feb 2015. Traffic might to to 
> [email protected]; With Geronimo server getting discontinued we don't need the 
> TCK over here anyway

This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK 
adherence of Geronimo.  Our TCK contract prohibits discussions of this kind 
from being public and only those developers that are “registered” may 
participate, i.e. it can’t be folded into the pmc list.  If there is any 
possibility of future TCK work, it needs to be kept around.

> [email protected] -> close it; hmm is this still alive? Should all go to 
> [email protected];

Hmm, we have both?  One is not the alias of the other?

> [email protected] -> close it; 

There’s already a ticket to remove this.

> [email protected] -> close it;

Similar to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, If there is any 
possibility of future TCK work, it needs to be kept around.


> [email protected] -> full of spam! hell, this is a mess, we should drop it and 
> use [email protected] for handling security related things. wdyt?

There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated.  I don’t see 
any, but I haven’t performed a detailed inventory of my spam folders.  The 
mailing list security@*.a.o is kinda a known standard where security 
organizations can privately report security problems.

> As a result we would keep the following lists:
> 
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> [email protected] (might eventually get renamed to [email protected] to fit other ASF 
> projects, but that not urgent)
> 
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h, after that I'll trigger the infra work.
> 
> Here is my +1

With that said, I’m a +0.5 to remove those lists for which there is a ticket.


Regards,
Alan

Reply via email to