Hi Alan! Thanks for the feedback!
ad user@ > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is due to > the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists. Yes, but does having 2 mails per year really justify having such a separate list? Especially when we move over from an 'enduser product' (Geronimo server) to developer targetting products? There are many ASF projects which do not have a user@ but a dev list. I have no hard feelings though, we can get rid of it later as well. Just wanted to trigger the discussion. ad tck@ and servicemix-tck@ > This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK > adherence of Geronimo. Since we do not have any TCK anymore we probably also don't need it. The last real traffic is from early 2014 and points to servers which are long time gone (phoebe). EE 6 tests are run as part of TomEE anyway. The involved people have signed the necessary paperwork. I'd say we should move on over here. ad security@ > There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated. Well, it's a private list, but it doesn't seem to be moderated. See yourself https://lists.apache.org/[email protected] txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 21.04.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Alan Cabrera <[email protected]>: > > >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic. >> >> My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o. >> >> >> [email protected] -> merge into [email protected] We only had 2 messages in the whole last >> year! > > > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is due to > the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists. > >> [email protected] -> move to [email protected] >> >> [email protected] -> move to [email protected] >> >> [email protected] -> move to [email protected] > > There’s already a ticket to remove these. > >> [email protected] -> Last mail on Feb 2015. Traffic might to to >> [email protected]; With Geronimo server getting discontinued we don't need the >> TCK over here anyway > > This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK > adherence of Geronimo. Our TCK contract prohibits discussions of this kind > from being public and only those developers that are “registered” may > participate, i.e. it can’t be folded into the pmc list. If there is any > possibility of future TCK work, it needs to be kept around. > >> [email protected] -> close it; hmm is this still alive? Should all go to >> [email protected]; > > Hmm, we have both? One is not the alias of the other? > >> [email protected] -> close it; > > There’s already a ticket to remove this. > >> [email protected] -> close it; > > Similar to [email protected], If there is any possibility of future TCK > work, it needs to be kept around. > > >> [email protected] -> full of spam! hell, this is a mess, we should drop it and >> use [email protected] for handling security related things. wdyt? > > There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated. I don’t see > any, but I haven’t performed a detailed inventory of my spam folders. The > mailing list security@*.a.o is kinda a known standard where security > organizations can privately report security problems. > >> As a result we would keep the following lists: >> >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> [email protected] (might eventually get renamed to [email protected] to fit other ASF >> projects, but that not urgent) >> >> >> Any objections? >> >> The VOTE is open for 72h, after that I'll trigger the infra work. >> >> Here is my +1 > > With that said, I’m a +0.5 to remove those lists for which there is a ticket. > > > Regards, > Alan >
