+1, had a doubt on tck ones (same as Alan I guess) but think it was more a "can be usefull" than a "will be" so happy if it is dropped too.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-04-21 15:36 GMT+02:00 Alan Cabrera <[email protected]>: > > On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic. > > My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o. > > > [email protected] -> merge into [email protected] We only had 2 messages in the whole > last year! > > > > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is due > to the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists. > > [email protected] -> move to [email protected] > > [email protected] -> move to [email protected] > > [email protected] -> move to [email protected] > > > There’s already a ticket to remove these. > > [email protected] -> Last mail on Feb 2015. Traffic might to to > [email protected]; With Geronimo server getting discontinued we don't need > the TCK over here anyway > > > This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK > adherence of Geronimo. Our TCK contract prohibits discussions of this kind > from being public and only those developers that are “registered” may > participate, i.e. it can’t be folded into the pmc list. If there is any > possibility of future TCK work, it needs to be kept around. > > [email protected] -> close it; hmm is this still alive? Should all go to > [email protected]; > > > Hmm, we have both? One is not the alias of the other? > > [email protected] -> close it; > > > There’s already a ticket to remove this. > > [email protected] -> close it; > > > Similar to [email protected], If there is any possibility of future TCK > work, it needs to be kept around. > > > [email protected] -> full of spam! hell, this is a mess, we should drop it > and use [email protected] for handling security related things. wdyt? > > > There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated. I don’t > see any, but I haven’t performed a detailed inventory of my spam folders. > The mailing list security@*.a.o is kinda a known standard where security > organizations can privately report security problems. > > As a result we would keep the following lists: > > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] (might eventually get renamed to [email protected] to fit other > ASF projects, but that not urgent) > > > Any objections? > > The VOTE is open for 72h, after that I'll trigger the infra work. > > Here is my +1 > > > With that said, I’m a +0.5 to remove those lists for which there is a > ticket. > > > Regards, > Alan > >
