Hi JL, Think we - as a vendor - shouldn't relocate or create any TCK flavor. AFAIK Microprofile did migrate their last version to jakarta so they should have some TCK somewhere - we can use snapshots in a profile for ex. AFAIK we have some road to upgrade to last versions but it also broke dramatically backward compatibility for end users - from my user side this is one of the reason making microprofile > 1.0 (ie pure EE) abandonned - so not sure how we want to tackle that since breaking for no real new feature is not great for a community but if we want to maintain some impl we'll have to go that way at some point anyway, ideas welcomed.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 31 mars 2022 à 09:51, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > Small update regarding jakarta namespace switch and MicroProfile. Adding > Geronimo dev@list because we are using most of the Geronimo > implementations > > In order to migrate, we have created a shaded version of all MicroProfile > APIs to relocate all javax to jakarta. It worked but it's causing some > issues with TCK. They are not relocated so of course, all TCK are failing. > > I wanted to see how far we are regarding our implementations, so I went > ahead and updated all TCK to the latest version (and compatible with the > Jakarta namespace). > > The other option would be to grab all the TCK and create their equivalent > in jakarta namespace using the same approach as for the APIs. > > What are your thoughts? > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com >
