rmannibucau commented on code in PR #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/34#discussion_r1051440363
##########
xbean-finder/src/main/java/org/apache/xbean/finder/archive/JarArchive.java:
##########
@@ -41,22 +44,63 @@ public class JarArchive implements Archive, AutoCloseable {
private final JarFile jar;
private final MJarSupport mjar = new MJarSupport();
- public JarArchive(ClassLoader loader, URL url) {
+ /*
+ * Supports only 'file:/...' or 'jar:file:/...!/' URLs
+ */
+ public JarArchive(ClassLoader loader, URL url){
// if (!"jar".equals(url.getProtocol())) throw new
IllegalArgumentException("not a jar url: " + url);
- try {
- this.loader = loader;
- this.url = url;
- URL u = url;
+ this.loader = loader;
+ this.url = url;
+ File jarFile = null;
+ String jarPath;
+ int idx;
- String jarPath = url.getFile();
- if (jarPath.contains("!")) {
- jarPath = jarPath.substring(0, jarPath.indexOf("!"));
- u = new URL(jarPath);
+ // Wipe out 'jar:' prefix AND '!/{...}' suffix(if any)
+ if("jar".equalsIgnoreCase(url.getProtocol())){
+
+ try{
+ jarPath = url.getPath();
+ url = new URL(jarPath.substring(0, jarPath.lastIndexOf("!/")));
+ }catch(MalformedURLException ex){
+ // Probably CPU overheat and/or DRAM undervoltage
Review Comment:
Yes, it is really about the URL contract and potentially a wrong
sub-protocol (not file nor a supported protocol)
Overall the point is that the comment is misleading so shouldn't be written
this way and likely not rethrow it as a `UnsupportedOperationException` but
more an `IllegalArgumentException` maybe, wdyt?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
