[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1875?focusedWorklogId=876236&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-876236
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-1875:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 15/Aug/23 00:31
            Start Date: 15/Aug/23 00:31
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: umustafi commented on code in PR #3737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3737#discussion_r1294083669


##########
gobblin-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/scheduler/JobScheduler.java:
##########
@@ -583,12 +582,17 @@ public void close() throws IOException {
   }
 
   /**
-   * Get a {@link org.quartz.Trigger} from the given job configuration 
properties.
+   * Get a {@link org.quartz.Trigger} from the given job configuration 
properties. If triggerSuffix is provided, appends
+   * it to the end of the flow name.
    */
-  public static Trigger createTriggerForJob(JobKey jobKey, Properties 
jobProps) {

Review Comment:
   Yea I checked everywhere and added. It would not compile otherwise also. 





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 876236)
    Time Spent: 1h  (was: 50m)

> Create Unique Trigger identifiers 
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GOBBLIN-1875
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1875
>             Project: Apache Gobblin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: gobblin-service
>            Reporter: Urmi Mustafi
>            Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We are seeing the following errors when trying to schedule reminders for 
> Multi-active scheduler after losing lease acquisition:
> {{Unable to store Trigger with name: '...' and group: '...' because one 
> already exists with this identification}}
> The Quartz scheduler allows multiple unique triggers mapping to one job in a 
> N:1 relation, but this requires the trigger having a unique identifier 
> associated with it. When we create triggers, we were previously using only 
> the job name and group to identify the trigger so we're unable to add 
> additional triggers for the same job. The trigger key is only used internally 
> by the Quartz scheduler, so it is safe to manipulate by adding a random 
> number to identify the trigger. We also don't expect more than a handful of 
> triggers associated with a job, so an int 0 to 1000 will be sufficient to 
> uniquely identify the trigger.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to