homatthew opened a new pull request, #3738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3738

   
   
   Dear Gobblin maintainers,
   
   Please accept this PR. I understand that it will not be reviewed until I 
have checked off all the steps below!
   
   
   ### JIRA
   - [X] My PR addresses the following [Gobblin 
JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN/) issues and references 
them in the PR title. For example, "[GOBBLIN-XXX] My Gobblin PR"
       - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-XXX
   
   
   
   ### Description
   - [X] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots (if 
applicable):
   Gobblin has the ability to process records from multiple kafka brokers, 
across multiple *.conf files and *.job files. But the tracking metadata / 
observability does a poor job of specifying which broker the events correspond 
to.
   
   This is because Gobblin was written with the assumption that it would 
consume from a single aggregate kafka broker (e.g. brooklin). But going 
forward, we want to add support for multiple *.conf files each with their own 
kafka broker. This change adds a utility for mapping the different Kafka broker 
URI's to a simple human readable name that can be used within 
`GobblinTrackingEvent` and `GobblinMetadataChangeEvent`s for Iceberg data loss 
tracking.
   
   ### Tests
   - [X] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for 
this extremely good reason:
   
`gobblin-modules/gobblin-kafka-common/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/KafkaCommonUtilTest.java`
   - tests that the map parsing works correctly
   
`gobblin-modules/gobblin-kafka-common/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/source/extractor/extract/kafka/KafkaExtractorTest.java`
   - Tests the assumptions error codes for having exactly one `kafka.brokers` 
specified, and that the simple name map is defined with the kafka broker 
specified in `kafka.brokers` is also defined in the map. 
   
   
   ### Commits
   - [ ] My commits all reference JIRA issues in their subject lines, and I 
have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my 
commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
       1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
       2. Subject is limited to 50 characters
       3. Subject does not end with a period
       4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
       5. Body wraps at 72 characters
       6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to