Hi, > GravitinoGlueCredentialsProvider: the match is to Doris's provider, not AWS's > sample, so I've left it as-is per your note - happy to credit it if you > prefer.
I’m still concerned by this; it’s a 65% match, so probably better on the safe side and credit Doris rather than leave it. Doris may have taken it from AWS, but as we don’t know that, so that approach should be fine. The objective here is to ensure users are aware of all 3rd-party code included and their licenses. Kind Regards, Justin
