-1. I never knew I was missing those operators. I think there's a huge
benefit to having a clean syntax.
+1 for !in and !instanceof though.
-Henrik
On 11/22/16 3:44 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
I must confess I'm also a bit worried with those operators too.
For !in and !instanceof, I really like the idea, but here, it's closer
to Ascii art.
What others think?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Cédric Champeau
<cedric.champ...@gmail.com <mailto:cedric.champ...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I find this very hard to decipher. The fact we wonder about the
semantics is a red warning to me. I wouldn't add those to the
language.
Le 22 nov. 2016 12:18, "Daniel Sun" <realblue...@hotmail.com
<mailto:realblue...@hotmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi Jochen,
According to your proposals, I'm going to add the
following operators:
1) !&& a !&& b === !(a && b)
2) !|| a !|| b === !(a || b)
3) !& a !& b === !(a & b)
4) !| a !| b === !(a | b)
5) ~& a ~& b === ~(a & b)
6) ~| a ~| b === ~(a | b)
Could you confirm whether the semantics of these
operators are right
or not?
Thanks,
Daniel.Sun
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736882.html
<http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736882.html>
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
