Agreed.
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I must confess I'm also a bit worried with those operators too.
> For !in and !instanceof, I really like the idea, but here, it's closer to
> Ascii art.
> What others think?
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I find this very hard to decipher. The fact we wonder about the semantics is
> a red warning to me. I wouldn't add those to the language.
>
>
> Le 22 nov. 2016 12:18, "Daniel Sun" <realblue...@hotmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Jochen,
>
> According to your proposals, I'm going to add the following operators:
>
> 1) !&& a !&& b === !(a && b)
> 2) !|| a !|| b === !(a || b)
> 3) !& a !& b === !(a & b)
> 4) !| a !| b === !(a | b)
> 5) ~& a ~& b === ~(a & b)
> 6) ~| a ~| b === ~(a | b)
>
> Could you confirm whether the semantics of these operators are right
> or not?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736882.html
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge / Google+
