-1 from me too, very confusing. +1 for only !in and !instanceof Cheers
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > Agreed. > >> On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I must confess I'm also a bit worried with those operators too. >> For !in and !instanceof, I really like the idea, but here, it's closer to >> Ascii art. >> What others think? >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Cédric Champeau >> <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I find this very hard to decipher. The fact we wonder about the semantics is >> a red warning to me. I wouldn't add those to the language. >> >> >> Le 22 nov. 2016 12:18, "Daniel Sun" <realblue...@hotmail.com> a écrit : >> Hi Jochen, >> >> According to your proposals, I'm going to add the following operators: >> >> 1) !&& a !&& b === !(a && b) >> 2) !|| a !|| b === !(a || b) >> 3) !& a !& b === !(a & b) >> 4) !| a !| b === !(a | b) >> 5) ~& a ~& b === ~(a & b) >> 6) ~| a ~| b === ~(a | b) >> >> Could you confirm whether the semantics of these operators are right >> or not? >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736882.html >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> -- >> Guillaume Laforge >> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President >> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform >> >> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >> Social: @glaforge / Google+ > -- Graeme Rocher
