+1 yes, especially if it's overloadable as per the other operators
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is the > replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576> ) . > > Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad) > > BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the old > parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser > Parrot :) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
