Is the "implies" method supposed to work with Groovy Truth or with booleans only? If the former then this would pose a problem as anyone that has defined an "X implies(Y)" method would have access to => If the latter then I guess that may not be a proplem.
Assuming "X implies(Y)" would be the convention for => just like "X plus(Y)" is for +, and so on. Cheers, Andres ------------------------------------------- Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast http://jroller.com/aalmiray http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray -- What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is the > replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576> ) . > > Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad) > > BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the old > parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser > Parrot :) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
