+1 if follows the convention mentioned by Andres On 25 Jan 2017 17:58, "Andres Almiray" <aalmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the "implies" method supposed to work with Groovy Truth or with > booleans only? > If the former then this would pose a problem as anyone that has defined an > "X implies(Y)" method would have access to => > If the latter then I guess that may not be a proplem. > > Assuming "X implies(Y)" would be the convention for => just like "X > plus(Y)" is for +, and so on. > > Cheers, > Andres > > ------------------------------------------- > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > http://jroller.com/aalmiray > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, > and those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is >> the >> replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576> ) . >> >> Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad) >> >> BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the >> old >> parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser >> Parrot :) >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble >> .com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
