I have no idea about that issue, but I'm impressed by your enthusiasm thus I want to encourage you to advance bravely. There's nobody responding to you, maybe these bugs are too old to be recalled by people? I hope you're not discouraged.
Just like you, I tried to make my first contribution several months ago, and I picked up some Critical and Major bugs to fix, which were actually pretty to easy. So what I want to say is don't be scared by the Priority, maybe you can try some other bugs you're interested in? I believe you can make perfect contributions. Good luck to you. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: > +group > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:00 AM Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Awesome, I will provide my analysis on GROOVY-5227 soon. Thank you! >> >> Regards, >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:06 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Yazad, >>> >>> I wouldn't bother with GROOVY-7388. I can imagine some scenarios where >>> ambiguous messages might occur but they wouldn't involve normal usage of >>> those methods. I have closed for now. If the OP provides more information >>> we can pursue that one. >>> >>> GROOVY-5227 seems worthy of investigation. An analysis would be great. >>> >>> Hopefully some more tickets will be ready over the next few days based >>> on my other email. >>> >>> Cheers, Paul. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have been looking around to see if there some simple items I can >>>> pick up to make some initial contributions. I see 3 trivial tickets >>>> that I can work on if that's ok, >>>> >>>> GROOVY-7388 >>>> DefaultGroovyMethods class's plus(T[] left, xxxx<T> right) have >>>> ambiguous errors >>>> >>>> In this ticket I see Paul has requested a test case and has not >>>> received a response, I could look at providing a test case and a fix >>>> for this. Note I see that there also a duplicate filed but that is >>>> closed without any work-log or comments. >>>> >>>> GROOVY-5227 >>>> AbstractHttpServlet should extend GenericServlet directly instead of >>>> HttpServlet >>>> >>>> Looks like this is one of the tickets where I may be able to provide >>>> some analysis and suggestions and based on that a decision can be made >>>> to either close it or implement it. >>>> >>>> Both tickets have had some comments in 2016 but don't seem to have an >>>> owner. Please let me know if I can pick them up. Thank you. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Yazad Khambata >>>> >>> >>>
