Thanks a lot Bo, actually Paul responded to me this morning and I noticed just forwarded to the whole team for the record. I think I broke the chain while forwarding. Sorry!
Thank you for the kind words so far I have interacted with Paul and you and I feel very welcomed. I am sure I have a lot to learn from the teams collective experience. Thank you! Regards, Yazad Khambata On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:51 AM bo zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no idea about that issue, but I'm impressed by your enthusiasm thus > I want to encourage you to advance bravely. There's nobody responding to > you, maybe these bugs are too old to be recalled by people? I hope you're > not discouraged. > > Just like you, I tried to make my first contribution several months ago, > and I picked up some Critical and Major bugs to fix, which were actually > pretty to easy. So what I want to say is don't be scared by the Priority, > maybe you can try some other bugs you're interested in? > > I believe you can make perfect contributions. Good luck to you. > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +group >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:00 AM Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> Awesome, I will provide my analysis on GROOVY-5227 soon. Thank you! >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:06 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Yazad, >>>> >>>> I wouldn't bother with GROOVY-7388. I can imagine some scenarios where >>>> ambiguous messages might occur but they wouldn't involve normal usage of >>>> those methods. I have closed for now. If the OP provides more information >>>> we can pursue that one. >>>> >>>> GROOVY-5227 seems worthy of investigation. An analysis would be great. >>>> >>>> Hopefully some more tickets will be ready over the next few days based >>>> on my other email. >>>> >>>> Cheers, Paul. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have been looking around to see if there some simple items I can >>>>> pick up to make some initial contributions. I see 3 trivial tickets >>>>> that I can work on if that's ok, >>>>> >>>>> GROOVY-7388 >>>>> DefaultGroovyMethods class's plus(T[] left, xxxx<T> right) have >>>>> ambiguous errors >>>>> >>>>> In this ticket I see Paul has requested a test case and has not >>>>> received a response, I could look at providing a test case and a fix >>>>> for this. Note I see that there also a duplicate filed but that is >>>>> closed without any work-log or comments. >>>>> >>>>> GROOVY-5227 >>>>> AbstractHttpServlet should extend GenericServlet directly instead of >>>>> HttpServlet >>>>> >>>>> Looks like this is one of the tickets where I may be able to provide >>>>> some analysis and suggestions and based on that a decision can be made >>>>> to either close it or implement it. >>>>> >>>>> Both tickets have had some comments in 2016 but don't seem to have an >>>>> owner. Please let me know if I can pick them up. Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Yazad Khambata >>>>> >>>> >>>> >
