Forwarded broken chain earlier. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> Date: Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:00 AM Subject: Re: Some trivial tickets To: <[email protected]>
Hi Paul, Awesome, I will provide my analysis on GROOVY-5227 soon. Thank you! Regards, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:06 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Yazad, > > I wouldn't bother with GROOVY-7388. I can imagine some scenarios where > ambiguous messages might occur but they wouldn't involve normal usage of > those methods. I have closed for now. If the OP provides more information > we can pursue that one. > > GROOVY-5227 seems worthy of investigation. An analysis would be great. > > Hopefully some more tickets will be ready over the next few days based on > my other email. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have been looking around to see if there some simple items I can >> pick up to make some initial contributions. I see 3 trivial tickets >> that I can work on if that's ok, >> >> GROOVY-7388 >> DefaultGroovyMethods class's plus(T[] left, xxxx<T> right) have ambiguous >> errors >> >> In this ticket I see Paul has requested a test case and has not >> received a response, I could look at providing a test case and a fix >> for this. Note I see that there also a duplicate filed but that is >> closed without any work-log or comments. >> >> GROOVY-5227 >> AbstractHttpServlet should extend GenericServlet directly instead of >> HttpServlet >> >> Looks like this is one of the tickets where I may be able to provide >> some analysis and suggestions and based on that a decision can be made >> to either close it or implement it. >> >> Both tickets have had some comments in 2016 but don't seem to have an >> owner. Please let me know if I can pick them up. Thank you. >> >> Regards, >> Yazad Khambata >> > >
