But the fact that it is an internal implementation detail does not
prohibit technical minded people to be interested in them. Most
developers I have met were interested in such things.
Most men have e.g. at least some knowledge about the inner workings of
their car, even if that are internal implementation details.
In any case I think it would be worth a try, if nothing comes of it,
nothing is lost...
On 21.12.2017 15:59, Cédric Champeau wrote:
I disagree. 99% of our users don't even know what call site
caching is. They don't know what invokedynamic means,
You think that 99% of Java professionals do not know what a
feature that has been around since Java 7 is ?
And even if that was the case: Google "java invoke dynamic" =>
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6638735/whats-invokedynamic-and-how-do-i-use-it
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6638735/whats-invokedynamic-and-how-do-i-use-it>
from 2011
Of course. It's not a user facing feature. It's an internal
implementation detail of JVM languages. Even if you play with
`MethodHandles`, you will never deal directly with invoke dynamic.
