+0 I do not have an opinion on this, but no objections either ;-)

Den tirs. 2. dec. 2025 kl. 13.05 skrev Mattias Reichel <[email protected]>:

> +1 Sounds like a good idea!
>
> /Mattias
>
> Den tis 2 dec. 2025 kl 12:34 skrev Paul King <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > When we created the Geb subproject, I went ahead and created what I
> > thought were the normal mailing lists including geb-users and geb-dev.
> > I have since refreshed my memory on what is recommended for
> > subprojects and having a separate geb-dev list is not recommended
> > within the ASF. Formal votes need to happen anyway on the Groovy dev
> > (or in rare cases private) list, and in the past some projects with
> > such lists suffered from fragmentation. The geb-dev traffic has been
> > super low, so I was going to ask infra to delete or archive it
> > (whatever they would normally do in such cases). I suggest we keep the
> > geb-users list for now.
> >
> > The folks most involved in Geb have already suggested that geb-dev
> > isn't really needed. Instead of using the geb-dev list, we'd just use
> > the dev list and use a prefix such as [Geb] if the context isn't super
> > obvious.
> >
> > This is a DISCUSS thread. If there are no objections, I'll do a
> > followup VOTE thread in a few days.
> >
> > Paul.
>


-- 

Med venlig hilsen,
Søren Berg Glasius

Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry
Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88
--- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.

Reply via email to