+1
On 12/2/25 12:41 PM, Jonny wrote:
I've said as much elsewhere, but yeah, let's remove it.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 7:52 AM Sergio del Amo
<[email protected]> wrote:
No objections from me either.
On 2 Dec 2025, at 14:49, Søren Berg Glasius <[email protected]>
wrote:
+0 I do not have an opinion on this, but no objections either ;-)
Den tirs. 2. dec. 2025 kl. 13.05 skrev Mattias Reichel
<[email protected]>:
+1 Sounds like a good idea!
/Mattias
Den tis 2 dec. 2025 kl 12:34 skrev Paul King
<[email protected]>:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> When we created the Geb subproject, I went ahead and
created what I
> thought were the normal mailing lists including geb-users
and geb-dev.
> I have since refreshed my memory on what is recommended for
> subprojects and having a separate geb-dev list is not
recommended
> within the ASF. Formal votes need to happen anyway on the
Groovy dev
> (or in rare cases private) list, and in the past some
projects with
> such lists suffered from fragmentation. The geb-dev traffic
has been
> super low, so I was going to ask infra to delete or archive it
> (whatever they would normally do in such cases). I suggest
we keep the
> geb-users list for now.
>
> The folks most involved in Geb have already suggested that
geb-dev
> isn't really needed. Instead of using the geb-dev list,
we'd just use
> the dev list and use a prefix such as [Geb] if the context
isn't super
> obvious.
>
> This is a DISCUSS thread. If there are no objections, I'll do a
> followup VOTE thread in a few days.
>
> Paul.
--
Med venlig hilsen,
Søren Berg Glasius
Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry
Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88
--- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.
