I've said as much elsewhere, but yeah, let's remove it. On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 7:52 AM Sergio del Amo <[email protected]> wrote:
> No objections from me either. > > On 2 Dec 2025, at 14:49, Søren Berg Glasius <[email protected]> wrote: > > +0 I do not have an opinion on this, but no objections either ;-) > > Den tirs. 2. dec. 2025 kl. 13.05 skrev Mattias Reichel <[email protected] > >: > >> +1 Sounds like a good idea! >> >> /Mattias >> >> Den tis 2 dec. 2025 kl 12:34 skrev Paul King <[email protected]>: >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > When we created the Geb subproject, I went ahead and created what I >> > thought were the normal mailing lists including geb-users and geb-dev. >> > I have since refreshed my memory on what is recommended for >> > subprojects and having a separate geb-dev list is not recommended >> > within the ASF. Formal votes need to happen anyway on the Groovy dev >> > (or in rare cases private) list, and in the past some projects with >> > such lists suffered from fragmentation. The geb-dev traffic has been >> > super low, so I was going to ask infra to delete or archive it >> > (whatever they would normally do in such cases). I suggest we keep the >> > geb-users list for now. >> > >> > The folks most involved in Geb have already suggested that geb-dev >> > isn't really needed. Instead of using the geb-dev list, we'd just use >> > the dev list and use a prefix such as [Geb] if the context isn't super >> > obvious. >> > >> > This is a DISCUSS thread. If there are no objections, I'll do a >> > followup VOTE thread in a few days. >> > >> > Paul. >> > > > -- > > Med venlig hilsen, > Søren Berg Glasius > > Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry > Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88 > --- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes. > > >
