There is nothing forbiding you to pay a committer to work on a specific part of the code. Although this contribution must be accepted by the community, which is not 100% guaranteed.
Le dimanche 12 avril 2015, <[email protected]> a écrit : > I suppose this speaks to one of the drawbacks of the move to apache, > there's no obvious way for monetary contributions to particular projects > or portions of a project. > > Maybe not a drawback per se. An opportunity perhaps? > > -- > David Dawson > CEO > > Simplicity Itself Ltd > Tel +7866011256 > Skype davidadawson > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://www.simplicityitself.com > Original Message > From: Russel Winder > Sent: Sunday, 12 April 2015 17:27 > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > Reply To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > Subject: Re: Re: GGTS/ Eclipse support for the groovy ecosystem > > On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 16:49 +0200, Mauro Molinari wrote: > > > […] > > And no, I can't switch to another IDE because of Groovy, for many > > reasons. The number of Eclipse tools and plugins we use is significant > > and I can't force the whole company to change IDE just because of Groovy > > support from it. No offence, but if I really have to make a choice here, > > I'm sorry to say that I must choose to drop Groovy and replace it with > > Java (or some other alternative). > > If the plugin is important to you, there is nothing stopping your > organization resourcing the maintenance of the plugin. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t:+44 20 7585 2200 voip:sip: > [email protected] <javascript:;> > 41 Buckmaster Road m:+44 7770 465 077 xmpp:[email protected] > <javascript:;> > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype:russel_winder > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
