Hi AFAIK nothing yet has been asked to infra. Perso I find that a pain to have a lot of repositories (but sure it's me :-) ) What about having those docker modules included in server and client. It looks everything is released together? BTW those dockers repositories are just simple configuration files.
This would mean only 3 repositories: * guacamole-client * guacamole-server * guacamole-manual Is it really a problem? On 25 February 2016 at 11:09, Mike Jumper <[email protected]> wrote: > Can any mentor speak to whether multiple repositories are indeed a > possibility for an incubating project? Is it too late to ask infra to > tear down the single repo, and instead copy the existing structure by > creating: > > 1) guacamole-client > 2) guacamole-server > 3) guacamole-manual > 4) guacamole-docker > 5) guacd-docker > > ? > > Thanks, > > - Mike > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:13 PM, James Muehlner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am in favor of keeping the multiple repos we have now, although I would > > be happy to be convinced otherwise. > > > > I think that the advantages of moving to a single repo (only having to > > check out one project, potential to help reduce protocol mismatch errors) > > do not outweigh the advantages of staying with the current structure, > which > > include familiarity for existing users, compatibility with currently > > existing documentation, and a clearer separation of concerns. > > > > I also agree that "guacamole-client" is a confusing name, since it does > > contain some server side code, but no better name comes immediately to > mind. > > > > James > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
