Agreed, 1.0 gives a feeling of stability which I think we are not ready to
support.
We're on the right path but let's get there without rushing ;)
Tommaso

2012/5/24 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>

> > BTW should we rename this release to 1.0?
>
> Well, according to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Version_1.0_as_a_milestone
> ,
> Version 1.0 is a matter of pride and satisfaction. I think we are not
> ready yet.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Thomas Jungblut (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281117#comment-13281117]
> >
> > Thomas Jungblut commented on HAMA-578:
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > We need to get a new logo, ours contains the incubator.
> > BTW should we rename this release to 1.0?
> >
> >> Prepare Hama 0.5 release as a top level project
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>                 Key: HAMA-578
> >>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578
> >>             Project: Hama
> >>          Issue Type: Task
> >>            Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> >>
> >>  * Remove Incubator disclaimer in SVN and Website
> >>  * Remove "-incubating" suffix in POMs
> >>  * Change infra information e.g., SVN, mailing list, ..., etc
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> > For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>

Reply via email to