[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13288366#comment-13288366
]
Thomas Jungblut commented on HAMA-578:
--------------------------------------
As far as I understood aggregators, they are observing the value of a vertex
not the messages.
Actually we should give the Aggregators just an <? extends Writable> argument
to aggregate, since it is not necessary a message type or value type.
bq.And, I'd like to change the sequence of template arguments to V, E, M as
below:
Why are you restricting the interface back? It's more flexible with ID, VALUE,
EDGE_VALUE.
We could add M_TYPE, but don't know if this is viable in most cases.
> Prepare Hama 0.5 release as a top level project
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.5.0
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.5.0
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> * Remove Incubator disclaimer in SVN and Website
> * Remove "-incubating" suffix in POMs
> * Change infra information e.g., SVN, mailing list, ..., etc
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
