Agreed that 1.0 should be a milestone without rushing.
On 24 May 2012 18:16, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, 1.0 gives a feeling of stability which I think we are not ready to > support. > We're on the right path but let's get there without rushing ;) > Tommaso > > 2012/5/24 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> > BTW should we rename this release to 1.0? >> >> Well, according to >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Version_1.0_as_a_milestone >> , >> Version 1.0 is a matter of pride and satisfaction. I think we are not >> ready yet. >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Thomas Jungblut (JIRA) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281117#comment-13281117] >> > >> > Thomas Jungblut commented on HAMA-578: >> > -------------------------------------- >> > >> > We need to get a new logo, ours contains the incubator. >> > BTW should we rename this release to 1.0? >> > >> >> Prepare Hama 0.5 release as a top level project >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Key: HAMA-578 >> >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-578 >> >> Project: Hama >> >> Issue Type: Task >> >> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon >> >> >> >> * Remove Incubator disclaimer in SVN and Website >> >> * Remove "-incubating" suffix in POMs >> >> * Change infra information e.g., SVN, mailing list, ..., etc >> > >> > -- >> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA >> administrators: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa >> > For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >>
