Oh okay, so if you want to remove that, have a lot of fun. This reader is
needed, so people can create vertices from their own fileformat.
Going back to a sequencefile input will not only break backward
compatibility but also make the same issues we had before.

A Hama cluster is scalable. It means that the computing capacity
> should be increased by adding slaves. Right?


I'm sorry, but I don't see how this relates to the vertex input reader.

2012/12/10 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>

> A Hama cluster is scalable. It means that the computing capacity
> should be increased by adding slaves. Right?
>
> As I mentioned before, disk-queue and storing vertices on local disk
> are not urgent.
>
> In short, yeah, I wan to remove VertexInputReader and runtime
> partition in Graph package.
>
> See also,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-531?focusedCommentId=13527756&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13527756
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > uhm, I have no idea what you want to archieve, do you want to get back to
> > client-side partitioning?
> >
> > 2012/12/10 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
> >
> >> If there's no opinion, I'll remove VertexInputReader in
> >> GraphJobRunner, because it make code complex. Let's consider again
> >> about the VertexInputReader, after fixing HAMA-531 and HAMA-632
> >> issues.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Or, I'd like to get rid of VertexInputReader.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >> In fact, there's no choice but to use runtimePartitioning (because of
> >> >> VertexInputReader). Right? If so, I would like to delete all "if
> >> >> (runtimePartitioning) {" conditions.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> >> @eddieyoon
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> > @eddieyoon
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> @eddieyoon
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>

Reply via email to