> Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the > changes in 0.6.1?
Maybe, at least, I can test large input with this :) I can understand your concerns but, a proof of concept (on semi-large cluster) is needed (ASAP). IMO, there is the difference between (somewhat) proven status and (work in progress) conceptual status. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Suraj Menon <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the > changes in 0.6.1? > > -Suraj > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Tommaso Teofili > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> sounds good to me >> Tommaso >> >> >> 2013/3/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I plan on cutting a release this week for Hama 0.6.1. We fixed input >> > splitter and made few improvements. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > -- >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> > @eddieyoon >> > >> -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
