P.S., Of course, 0.6.1 is improved than 0.5 and 0.6. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the >> changes in 0.6.1? > > Maybe, at least, I can test large input with this :) > > I can understand your concerns but, a proof of concept (on semi-large > cluster) is needed (ASAP). IMO, there is the difference between > (somewhat) proven status and (work in progress) conceptual status. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Suraj Menon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the >> changes in 0.6.1? >> >> -Suraj >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Tommaso Teofili >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> sounds good to me >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I plan on cutting a release this week for Hama 0.6.1. We fixed input >>> > splitter and made few improvements. >>> > >>> > Thanks. >>> > -- >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> > @eddieyoon >>> > >>> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
