2013/3/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > > Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the > > changes in 0.6.1? > > Maybe, at least, I can test large input with this :) > > I can understand your concerns but, a proof of concept (on semi-large > cluster) is needed (ASAP).
Can you elaborate some more on this? Why do you think that's needed? Is that related to MRQL? > IMO, there is the difference between > (somewhat) proven status and (work in progress) conceptual status. > I'm not sure I understand sorry :) what do you mean here exactly? Thanks, Tommaso > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Suraj Menon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sure, can we ensure the new downstream application MRQL is fine with the > > changes in 0.6.1? > > > > -Suraj > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Tommaso Teofili > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> sounds good to me > >> Tommaso > >> > >> > >> 2013/3/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I plan on cutting a release this week for Hama 0.6.1. We fixed input > >> > splitter and made few improvements. > >> > > >> > Thanks. > >> > -- > >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> > @eddieyoon > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon >
