Andrew, This is very interesting. Thank you for the reference.
I've got few questions trying to understand your framework. 1. Why an interface Watcher extends Serializable? 2. Is there any project which uses p-unit for testing? Why have you started it? 3. Running tests in several VM is great, but how could I compare these results? 4. If I need to increase a parameter until the test fails and then report the final value as a test performance metrics how this should be done in p-unit? On 6/22/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Vladimir, > > Could yout please give few hints how one should write performance > tests using the harness? I found an option "-performance" but cannot > see anything else. I wonder how a testcase could report a performance > metrics. > > Actually I'm thinking now of reviving comparative stress testing approach. Hi Alexei, Do you have a chance to look at p-unit, (http://p-unit.sourceforge.net/)? I think it fulfills most of the requests listed in the documents. Another advantage of p-unit is that it can compare the performance between different vms. One problem may be the license (GPL now, going to change the license to GPL v3). If we really take it serious, I can relicense it immediately. [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei, > ESSD, Intel > -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
-- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
