On 6/22/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew, Thanks for your explanations. Let me address the main problem I see to migrate a stress test suite to p-unit. To which extend may I count on your support at further p-unit development?
4 hours per day. :) I listed very specific functionality which
probably didn't suite well your original idea. On 6/22/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/22/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Andrew, > > This is very interesting. Thank you for the reference. > > > Hi Alexei, please see my comments inline > > I've got few questions trying to understand your framework. > > 1. Why an interface Watcher extends Serializable? > > > Because it's for performance comparison between different vms. The runner > will be serialized, so that the vm can load the right runner. You can > consider it like serializing the configuration for the vm. > > 2. Is there any project which uses p-unit for testing? Why have you started > > it? > > > Polepos (https://sourceforge.net/projects/polepos) is going to refactor its > code to use p-unit. > > And I know serveral community members use p-unit to test concurrency > performance(by running the existing JUnit tests). > > I started it because I found that I can't do something as I want with JUnit, > :) like concurrency, performance test. Why do I have to start thread, and > join, and check the result at the end of join everytime? why do I need to > use System.currentMilliseconds and sysout... :) So I wrote p-unit. > > 3. Running tests in several VM is great, but how could I compare these > > results? > > > There're serveral build-in reports in p-unit. The most straightforward one > is pdf format, which contains performance chart. The results of different vm > for the same method are shown in the same page, so that you can know which > one is better easily. It's also easy to plugin your own report by > implementing PUnitEventListener. > > 4. If I need to increase a parameter until the test fails and then > > report the final value as a test performance metrics how this should > > be done in p-unit? > > > hm... this functionality is not supported in p-unit.... > > Thanks! > > On 6/22/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6/21/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Vladimir, > > > > > > > > Could yout please give few hints how one should write performance > > > > tests using the harness? I found an option "-performance" but cannot > > > > see anything else. I wonder how a testcase could report a performance > > > > metrics. > > > > > > > > Actually I'm thinking now of reviving comparative stress testing > > approach. > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > > > Do you have a chance to look at p-unit, ( http://p-unit.sourceforge.net/ > > )? > > > > > > I think it fulfills most of the requests listed in the documents. > > > > > > Another advantage of p-unit is that it can compare the performance > > between > > > different vms. > > > > > > One problem may be the license (GPL now, going to change the license to > > GPL > > > v3). If we really take it serious, I can relicense it immediately. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > > > > With best regards, > > > > Alexei, > > > > ESSD, Intel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew Zhang > > > > > > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > With best regards, > > Alexei, > > ESSD, Intel > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew Zhang > > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ > -- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
-- Best regards, Andrew Zhang http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
