Andrew, I haven't tried demo yet. I've noticed that you added a test for new functionality and decided to try it. I looked for trunk/punit.test/README.txt, then tried to find test targets in build.xml files. Finally I've tried Eclipse test runner:
1. Started Eclipse with the workspace set to trunk/ 2. Added punit, punit.extension, punit.samples, punit.test to the project tree. 3. Built punit and punit.extension by means of Ant. 4. Pressed right mouse button over punit.test and selected Run as -> JUnit test 5. Among 113 testcases 6 testcases testcases of tests.api.org.punit.testclasses.JUnitAnnotationTestClass reported an error. 6. Also I see that tests.api.org.punit.testclasses.LoopTestClass was absent in the test run results. When I ran both problematic classes as standalone applications I could see that testcases pass. That's make me think that the test design is ok, but it is not aligned with what Eclipse expects. To summarize, I see errors and missed tests. This might be a bug, or just I don't know enough details on how to run all tests. On 6/26/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/26/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew, > > That's great. You are really quick. I was still thinking when your > solution came up. I was able to build the project and run tests one by > one, though I wasn't able to use the perfect Eclipse plugin for JUnit > tests. Probably it could make sense to use just an ordinary junit for > testing p-unit itself. Hi Alexei, Do you mean p-unit tests here? p-unit uses both ordinary junit 4 and p-unit itself to run all tests for p-unit. They're AllTests(JUnit test suite format) and PUnitAllTests(p-unit test suite format) under punit.test\src\tests\api\org\punit\all directory. Files in punit.sample are run one by one, because each file is supposed to demo one functionality. :) It's for demo (not testing). Thanks! <snip> > On 6/25/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/22/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, > > > Thanks for your explanations. > > > > > > Let me address the main problem I see to migrate a stress test suite > > > to p-unit. To which extend may I count on your support at further > > > p-unit development? I listed very specific functionality which > > > probably didn't suite well your original idea. > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > Would you please check the latest sample code samples.LoopTestSample in > > punit.sample project? Is it the same as the original idea of toStop, > > toAbort? Thanks! > > > > On 6/22/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/22/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > This is very interesting. Thank you for the reference. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexei, please see my comments inline > > > > > > > > I've got few questions trying to understand your framework. > > > > > 1. Why an interface Watcher extends Serializable? > > > > > > > > > > > > Because it's for performance comparison between different vms. The > > > runner > > > > will be serialized, so that the vm can load the right runner. You > can > > > > consider it like serializing the configuration for the vm. > > > > > > > > 2. Is there any project which uses p-unit for testing? Why have you > > > started > > > > > it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Polepos (https://sourceforge.net/projects/polepos) is going to > refactor > > > its > > > > code to use p-unit. > > > > > > > > And I know serveral community members use p-unit to test concurrency > > > > performance(by running the existing JUnit tests). > > > > > > > > I started it because I found that I can't do something as I want > with > > > JUnit, > > > > :) like concurrency, performance test. Why do I have to start > thread, > > > and > > > > join, and check the result at the end of join everytime? why do I > need > > > to > > > > use System.currentMilliseconds and sysout... :) So I wrote p-unit. > > > > > > > > 3. Running tests in several VM is great, but how could I compare > these > > > > > results? > > > > > > > > > > > > There're serveral build-in reports in p-unit. The most > straightforward > > > one > > > > is pdf format, which contains performance chart. The results of > > > different vm > > > > for the same method are shown in the same page, so that you can know > > > which > > > > one is better easily. It's also easy to plugin your own report by > > > > implementing PUnitEventListener. > > > > > > > > 4. If I need to increase a parameter until the test fails and then > > > > > report the final value as a test performance metrics how this > should > > > > > be done in p-unit? > > > > > > > > > > > > hm... this functionality is not supported in p-unit.... > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 6/21/07, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Vladimir, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could yout please give few hints how one should write > performance > > > > > > > tests using the harness? I found an option "-performance" but > > > cannot > > > > > > > see anything else. I wonder how a testcase could report a > > > performance > > > > > > > metrics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually I'm thinking now of reviving comparative stress > testing > > > > > approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have a chance to look at p-unit, ( > > > http://p-unit.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > )? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it fulfills most of the requests listed in the > documents. > > > > > > > > > > > > Another advantage of p-unit is that it can compare the > performance > > > > > between > > > > > > different vms. > > > > > > > > > > > > One problem may be the license (GPL now, going to change the > license > > > to > > > > > GPL > > > > > > v3). If we really take it serious, I can relicense it > immediately. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > With best regards, > > > > > > > Alexei, > > > > > > > ESSD, Intel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Andrew Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > With best regards, > > > > > Alexei, > > > > > ESSD, Intel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew Zhang > > > > > > > > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > With best regards, > > > Alexei, > > > ESSD, Intel > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew Zhang > > > > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei, > ESSD, Intel > -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
-- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
