On 8/23/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gregory Shimansky wrote: > > I can put ebuild file somewhere on the site. We just need to decide > > which section should have the link to it. Probably besides the snapshots > > for M2? > > I remembered a better place, wiki. So I created the wiki page with > instructions > and attached the ebuild files to it. > > http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/GentooEbuilds > > I agree that it would be a good idea to add a 'packaged distributions' > link to the site, > and don't forget to link the .deb files produced by Mark
I might have missed it. Are they already available somewhere? > Yes, I think so. Is it possible to create a ebuild for JDK as well? > > I guess so, using the HDK download for it. There are two different binaries on the site, JDK and HDK. >> 4) Gentoo is not keen to have a version identifier 'M2', so I changed > >> it to '0.02'. It would be nice > >> if our release numbering would be compatible with packaging systems > >> without such changes, > >> to reduce confusion. > > > > It could be harmony-jre-bin-0.0-r2.ebuild probably? We didn't agree on > > any version number yet :) > > I think that will be misleading, as M2 is a version related to the Harmony > project, > rather than the ebuild version. > I thought of a different versioning scheme. A date could be used as a postfix of the version, e.g. 0.0.20070832, or the date of the M2 milestone. For example some gcc ebuilds use date when a CVS snapshot is used instead of an official release. BTW I didn't find an official document for the ebuild file name format. Do you know if one exist? -- Gregory
