Gregory Shimansky wrote: > On 8/23/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gregory Shimansky wrote: >>> I can put ebuild file somewhere on the site. We just need to decide >>> which section should have the link to it. Probably besides the snapshots >>> for M2? >> I remembered a better place, wiki. So I created the wiki page with >> instructions >> and attached the ebuild files to it. >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/GentooEbuilds >> >> I agree that it would be a good idea to add a 'packaged distributions' >> link to the site, >> and don't forget to link the .deb files produced by Mark > > > I might have missed it. Are they already available somewhere? > >> Yes, I think so. Is it possible to create a ebuild for JDK as well? >> >> I guess so, using the HDK download for it. > > > There are two different binaries on the site, JDK and HDK. > >>> 4) Gentoo is not keen to have a version identifier 'M2', so I changed >>>> it to '0.02'. It would be nice >>>> if our release numbering would be compatible with packaging systems >>>> without such changes, >>>> to reduce confusion. >>> It could be harmony-jre-bin-0.0-r2.ebuild probably? We didn't agree on >>> any version number yet :) >> I think that will be misleading, as M2 is a version related to the Harmony >> project, >> rather than the ebuild version. >> > > I thought of a different versioning scheme. A date could be used as a > postfix of the version, e.g. 0.0.20070832, or the date of the M2 milestone. > For example some gcc ebuilds use date when a CVS snapshot is used instead of > an official release.
How about the SVN revision number, which for M2 is 551077 ? Regards, Tim > BTW I didn't find an official document for the ebuild file name format. Do > you know if one exist? >
