Tim Ellison wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On 8/23/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I can put ebuild file somewhere on the site. We just need to decide
which section should have the link to it. Probably besides the snapshots
for M2?
I remembered a better place, wiki. So I created the wiki page with
instructions
and attached the ebuild files to it.
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/GentooEbuilds
I agree that it would be a good idea to add a 'packaged distributions'
link to the site,
and don't forget to link the .deb files produced by Mark
I might have missed it. Are they already available somewhere?
Yes, I think so. Is it possible to create a ebuild for JDK as well?
I guess so, using the HDK download for it.
There are two different binaries on the site, JDK and HDK.
4) Gentoo is not keen to have a version identifier 'M2', so I changed
it to '0.02'. It would be nice
if our release numbering would be compatible with packaging systems
without such changes,
to reduce confusion.
It could be harmony-jre-bin-0.0-r2.ebuild probably? We didn't agree on
any version number yet :)
I think that will be misleading, as M2 is a version related to the Harmony
project,
rather than the ebuild version.
I thought of a different versioning scheme. A date could be used as a
postfix of the version, e.g. 0.0.20070832, or the date of the M2 milestone.
For example some gcc ebuilds use date when a CVS snapshot is used instead of
an official release.
How about the SVN revision number, which for M2 is 551077 ?
These are usually used in *-svn and *-cvs builds for packages like
emacs-cvs that are meant to be using a svn/cvs revision from the
repository. Other packages in gentoo that use snapshots (be in a built
binary or packed source tree) from the web, not from svn/cvs repository
are usually using the date as the marker.
--
Gregory
