Sergey Kuksenko wrote: > I'd like to mention that HARMONY-5265 fixes all EUT on my runs. > Let's wait official EUT checking.
ack > Also I'd like to share some performance measurements: > HARMONY-5265 gives 4%-9% boost for SPECjbb2005. Here you are measuring the Java 5 impl before and after HARMONY-5265, right? Given that the Java 6 impl was improved by Jimmy it would be interesting to see how those two compare -- just so we know which way to merge the implementations. > Different boosts depends on > HW (different processors have different caches and memory sensitivity). > Note: HARMONY-5232 gives only 2%-5% boost. > Also I have a bunch of numbers for different micro-benchmarks and I am > planning to process and share them next week. Thanks, Tim
