2007/12/6, Sergey Kuksenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 12/6/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Also I'd like to share some performance measurements: > > > HARMONY-5265 gives 4%-9% boost for SPECjbb2005. > > > > Here you are measuring the Java 5 impl before and after HARMONY-5265, > > right? Given that the Java 6 impl was improved by Jimmy it would be > > interesting to see how those two compare -- just so we know which way to > > merge the implementations. > > > You are right. I measured Java5. implementation. > I think we can (and should) complete Java5 - Java6 comparison and merging > after M4. >
Yes, I'm looking forward this - hope java6 may also improve 4%-9%! :) > > Different boosts depends on > > > HW (different processors have different caches and memory sensitivity). > > > Note: HARMONY-5232 gives only 2%-5% boost. > > > Also I have a bunch of numbers for different micro-benchmarks and I am > > > planning to process and share them next week. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tim > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > --- > Sergey Kuksenko. > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division. > -- Best Regards! Jimmy, Jing Lv China Software Development Lab, IBM
