On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/3/28, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Is there any specific reason we're still on apr/apr-util 1.2.6? > > I guess the opposite, there were no specific reasons to upgrade so far.
True, but it would be nice to eliminate custom patches, if possible. > > > > I'm trying to get things running on Leopard and it seems 1.2.12 is > > necessity. How do we want to approach such an upgrade? > > Looking through APR patches if they're still actual/compatible and > testing, the more the better - should be enough. Is anyone familiar with the current patches? Any specific tests that might be considered regression tests for those patches? > > > > I noticed that the apr-iconv is also a bit out of date. > > Right, AFAIU this is apr-util dependency so to be upgraded as well. > > Regards, > Alexey > > > > > -Nathan > > >
