I've just finished testing on Win x86 with the new apr code and no patches. All of the kernel.test, smoke.test, reg.test and cunit.test pass without failure or error.
If there's no objection, I'm going to update to the latest apr source and remove the patches tonight. -Nathan On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tested apr 1.2.12, apr-util 1.2.12, apr-iconv 1.2.1 on Linux > x86_64 with the patched unix code removed and the DRLVM tests seem to > all be passing. I'm running the tests again to be sure. I'm also > running the tests on Linux x86. > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any specific reason we're still on apr/apr-util 1.2.6? > > > > I'm trying to get things running on Leopard and it seems 1.2.12 is > > necessity. How do we want to approach such an upgrade? > > > > I noticed that the apr-iconv is also a bit out of date. > > > > -Nathan > > >
