I've tested apr 1.2.12, apr-util 1.2.12, apr-iconv 1.2.1 on Linux x86_64 with the patched unix code removed and the DRLVM tests seem to all be passing. I'm running the tests again to be sure. I'm also running the tests on Linux x86.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any specific reason we're still on apr/apr-util 1.2.6? > > I'm trying to get things running on Leopard and it seems 1.2.12 is > necessity. How do we want to approach such an upgrade? > > I noticed that the apr-iconv is also a bit out of date. > > -Nathan >
